In June 1993, the science journal Nature published the exciting discovery of the oldest DNA ever extracted, belonging to a weevil who lived around 130 million years ago. The next day, Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park was released. For the director, this was a stroke of luck—free publicity from a reliable scientific source. In fact, the unfortunate weevil lived at the same time as the disonsaurs. But the coincidence lent publicity to the scientists also; “It boosted ancient DNA as an early science”, says historian Elizabeth Jones. “Something that people had never heard of suddenly became extremely popular.” For better or for worse, the dinosaur blockbuster pushed this field of study into the public eye.
The source for Jurassic Park was a book of the same name by Michael Crichton, which in turn was inspired by scientists. In 1982 for example, entomologist George Poinar Jr. and his colleagues examined a fossil fly encased in amber and suggested that it might be possible to extract its DNA. Crichton heard about the study, and It inspired his work of fiction. Poinar, together with another researcher Raul Cano, went on to publish the 1993 study on the weevil.When this study was published David Grimaldi, a lead researcher from a rival team, was quick to express concern. In extracting DNA from the weevil, the team had destroyed the specimen, which was likely to be unique. Grimaldi disapproved of this wanton disregard for important specimens for the sake of breaking records.
Indeed, the research was soon compromised. In 1997, a group of scientists tried and failed to replicate the experiment and extract DNA from fossils. Author Kimberley Walden wrote that their findings “bring other claims of amplifications from amber fossil insect specimens into question,” and concluded that the results of the 1993 study were “extremely questionable”. A year later, a different team concluded that the DNA taken from the weevil actually came from fungal contamination in the specimen. The buzz around Jurassic Park seems to have overemphasised the reliability of the 1993 study. But Elizabeth Jones doesn’t see it as a total failure; “a lot of science is trial and error and finding out what we don’t know”. What we now know is that in 2012 it was calculated that DNA has a half-life of only 521 years, meaning that it would be destroyed within 6.8 million years, if not earlier. So luckily for us, we will never have a test tube of T-Rex genes.
Applicants for the sciences may be interested in this example of fact meeting fiction. Should research allow itself to be influenced by society and popular culture? Can science ever be truly objective?
- Oxford college snapshots With 35 colleges and Permanent Private Halls, choosing how to... Read more >
- Music Scholarships There is a wide range of musical scholarships available to... Read more >
- COPA & International Deadlines Most deadlines are the same for all those applying to... Read more >
- July’s Top News Stories Read more about some of the biggest news stories to... Read more >
- Cambridge Law Test overview If you’re applying to read Law at Cambridge you will probably need... Read more >
- Download a Law Personal Statement 2 “I have read The Origins of the Second World War... Read more >
- Oxbridge Open Day Guide With open days drawing ever nearer, applicants and parents alike... Read more >
- Statistics: 2015 Annual Survey Want to find out what your chances are of getting... Read more >
- The Differences Between Similar Courses At Oxford and Cambridge For some applicants, deciding between applying to Oxford or Cambridge... Read more >
- Cambridge Law Test mini mock paper & answers If you are applying to do Law at Cambridge, chances... Read more >
- ELAT overview If you’re applying for English, or its joint schools, you... Read more >
- Oxford and Cambridge Access Schemes Oxford and Cambridge aim to offer places to the best... Read more >
- 20 Real-Life Oxford and Cambridge Interview Questions The Oxford and Cambridge interviews are notorious for having academically... Read more >
- BMAT mini mock paper & answers With over 90% of applicants now preparing for the admissions... Read more >
- March’s Top News Stories Read more about some of the biggest news stories to... Read more >
- What’s the Most Important Part of Your Application? An application to Oxford or Cambridge involves various different elements,... Read more >
- Social and Political Sciences Reading List We’ve brought together a wide-ranging bibliography to help those applying... Read more >
- Music Reading List Applying for Music at Cambridge or Oxford requires a range... Read more >
- Medical & Biological Sciences Reading Lists Medicine and the whole range of Biological Sciences are highly... Read more >
- TSA Oxford mini mock & answers Thinking is very important to Oxford, so they’ve devised an... Read more >
- Maths Puzzle: The Age of Census A census-taker knocks on a door, and asks the woman... Read more >
- Download a Biology Personal Statement “Assisting with the post mortem of a dairy cow during... Read more >
- TSA Cambridge mini mock & answers The Thinking Skills Assessment is required for a number of... Read more >
- Admissions Tests: our tips as featured in the Independent Last year, the Independent asked us to provide some simple... Read more >